THE CHALLENGE OF
UNLEARNING
Alvin Toffler says “The
illiterate of the twenty first century is not the one who cannot read and
write, but one who cannot learn, unlearn and relearn.’
This indeed raises the
question whether unlearning is a conscious process that happens through a
concerted and focused effort? Or is it a natural process that happens
continually in mind in a given environment? Or is it a process that can be
triggered through some cognitive or emotional inputs to the mind? While
clinical psychologists and brain researchers have done some path-breaking
discoveries relating to the methods and strategies that will help the brain to
unlearn from some its past behaviour, addictive trends, emotional hangovers and
belief systems, unlearning as a normal course of growth process has not been
adequately addressed, possibly because there are not clinical or psychological
demands to meet such situations or routines.
1.
Unlearning
is not an instant process.
No one has a magic wand to
wave and drive off the past learning at a given instant or period of time. It
calls for a complete re-engineering of the several brain connects, slowly
erasing the past memory, distancing from the thought nucleus. It calls for a
re-structured thought navigation and renewed focus and direction. Evidences do
show that some painful associations with past learning and related emotional
trauma do trigger in unlearning or help in escapist routes from retention of
such learning.
2.
Unlearning
is not completely a conscious action.
While some conscious effort
is made by people, it does not and need not necessarily result in unlearning.
It calls repeated auto-suggestion and mentoring. Repeated suggestions to the
mind about the absence of the need of a thought, a concept or a skill could progressively
lead to annihilation of a past learning.
3. ]
Resetting
priorities could lead to unlearning.
It is claimed by brain
scientists that the mind regulates the thought priorities and organizes their
navigation. Once the brain learns to reset its priorities and thus a particular
thought is successively negated or marginalized, the past learning finds itself
increasingly irrelevant and thus loses its latent structure.
4. Unlearning
is neither an exercise of selection or a choice
No
one makes a choice to unlearn or annihilate learning except for a desire. There
are no adequate evidences to show that unlearning is a preferred selection in
the process of re-engineering learning.
5.
Withdrawal
of rewards or fear of punishment trigger unlearning.
Studies
do show that learning associated with rewards facilitates its speed and
retention, but withdrawal of rewards deactivates the motives for learning. On a
similar note, the fear of punishment does trigger unlearning.
“Learning
is an external act. unlearning is an internal one… unlearning is
therefore, more difficult” says John Uldrich.
Unlearning is claimed to be
a survival skill. In a fast-changing universe of knowledge and skill dynamics,
the speed and the quantum of unlearning is considered as a learning asset.
The future holds promise for
a lot of interventional research and study on ‘unlearning’
No comments:
Post a Comment