Crisis is usually defined as a moment of ‘intense difficulty
or danger’ or ‘a time to take an important or a crucial decision.” It could be
personal, institutional, organizational or societal. It is
usually associated with an unanticipated, unplanned, natural or man-made
situation which disturbs the equilibrium of the processes and the engagement of
the people. It sets in a series of alarms whereby people feel emotionally
disturbed and often lose sight of the environment in which they function or a
sense of discomfort with the system with which they are engaged, and feel high
levels of insecurity. The situation pushes them into a sphere of intense fear
and the mind seeks all avenues of seeking security either for the self or for
operating circle in which they are placed. Such a situation could arise in any
profession, at any level of engagement or at any stage of an operational process.
Oftentimes, even the most diligent, competent, experienced and seasoned people
set themselves on emotional fire with a sense of helplessness. Or they could
drive the people working with them or associated with them to a level of
madness which they may not have anticipated. Managing a crisis has always been
a matter of serious debate in any management forum. The tools and techniques
required for managing different types of crises might vary depending on the
uniqueness of the process, geography and the operational universe. However,
there are certain fundamentals one should remember to effectively handle such
situations.
1.NEVER PRESS A
PANIC BUTTON.
In almost all
types of situations that relate to a crisis, the first reaction appears to be to
push a panic button. This is a natural selection of a human mind as a reaction
to an extreme sense of fear, insecurity or disturbance to an equilibrium state.
In doing so, they often lose their balance in behaviour and radiate a lot of stressful
energy, thus disturbing not only the equilibrium state of all others but
setting in a chain reaction. In this process, the core issue is often lost
sight of and the focus on controlling the causes that led to such a crisis is
not attended to. There is quite a possibility of the people involved moving
away from the nucleus of the problem. Hence it is very important to understand
that pressing a panic button really doesn’t help the management of a crisis,
but could indeed add more fuel to the problem.
2. NEVER
BELIEVE IN RUMOURS
It is usually
said the quantum of the smoke is always more than the quantum of the fire.
People often tend to see the spread of the smoke and start interpreting the
cause of the fire based on their own perceptions even without seeing the fire.
These perceptions are articulated into stories which are caricatured on some of
their intense feelings about the past history of a similar situation to which
they had been familiar. These stories
and the imageries associated with them have their locus far from the reality.
But they often tend to excite the much-needed emotions of the listeners.
Rumours, thus tend to play a devastating role in creating falsified pictures of
situations and tend to provoke actions which are unwarranted, uncalled for,
unethical or sometimes negative. It is therefore important that situations of
crisis should be insulated from rumour mongers. Those who are dealing with
solving issues that brought about the crisis should ensure that they don’t
believe in rumours.
3. NEVER YIELD
TO SELF-PITY
There are
occasions when the seriousness of a crisis may lead an individual or the team
to self-pity as a reflection to the occurrence. In trying to advocate
themselves that they could have been a little more cautious or alert in
avoiding a crisis of a given nature, they might lend themselves to self-pity or
a sense of self-defeat. The crisis manager or the team has to consciously or
deliberately avoid such situations or expressions of self-pity yielding to
defeatism. They need to get up and raise to face the situation with courage and
conviction. Losing the morale on such occasions is an avoidable possibility.
4. MAKE PRUDENT
DECISIONS
Most situations
of crisis will call for one’s urgent attention and a quick decision to be
taken. While decisions need to be taken quickly and contextually, it is equally
important that decision are not taken on an impulse or under a force of
circumstances or without proper consideration of the emergent situation.
Oftentimes, it will be like throwing water to quench an electrical fire which
would rather aggravate the situation rather than work as a healer. Possibly,
taking a collective decision with the help of a core group would be much
better, as collective wisdom often wins over an individual’s wisdom. However,
there may be situations when a crisis is handled by a single individual and
hence it might be a call of the time. On such occasions, with not much time
left to get over a crisis, the individual will have to quickly enlist a set of
priorities and put in place the action plan. It may also be useful to consider
an alternate action plan simultaneously.
5. REDUCE
REACTIONS; FOCUS ON ACTIONS
During times of
crisis, it is seen that a number of people feel wise enough to offer views,
opinions and suggestions which are absolutely out of context and sometimes they
might irritate the person handling the crisis. Also, one could find people who
would say “If I were in your place,”. There are also people who might provoke
you to react with statements which are aggressive, unethical and provocative.
It is important to keep oneself cool and engage in actions rather than
formulating reactions. Reacting to such people would not only shift the focus
from the core issue, but also would be waste of most purposeful time on such
occasions. Reactions tend to sap the energy of the people, who should be using
it productively during such occasions. This is not a time for justifying to
people what went wrong and why it went wrong.
6. DON’T
ENTERTAIN OR ENGAGE IN A BLAME GAME
One of the most
immediate happenings after an event of crisis or even during its own course is an
active” blame game”. Rather than addressing to the problem on hand and offering
the much-needed support, a few people engage into a blame game. They either
feel it is important to move away from the zones of responsibility or
accountability, or consider this as the most opportune time to target a few
others for the cause of the crisis. Blame games often come with a history of
events that led to such a situation or their observation of the crisis from its
embryonic stage. They look forward to people from whose shoulders they could
shoot their bullets. Crisis managers should ensure that they should not
entertain such people in the crisis operation zone or even if they are
existent, not to attach much significance to their entertainment.
7. DON’T EVER
PLAY A VICTIM
Some crisis
managers tend to play a victim on such occasions. They project themselves as a
part of the system in which such things happen and they are as such victims to
such situations. They tend to seek sympathy from others and want to build a
profile of themselves as people who shoulder such responsibilities knowing
fully well that such things would happen. Such utterances, projections by the
crisis managers show them in poor light. It is important to assume
responsibility on such occasions though logistics might prove later that
accountability for such happenings might somewhere else. Crisis Management
calls for display of courage, a sense of responsibility coupled with a bit of
wisdom to handle things with adequate maturity.
8. DON’T
HESITATE TO SEEK SUPPORT OR RESOURCES
The time of
crisis is not the time for display of one’s authority, power or seniority in an
organizational structure. It is a time for concerted efforts to undo a few
things which should not have happened or to set in place a few things which
have derailed from the system. It cannot be handled individually. The crisis
manager should have the capacity to mobilise both human and other resources
that would be required to ensure normalcy. There may be a number of people in
an organization who display situational leadership to handle crisis, though
they do not have a positional leadership. The crisis managers should let them
emerge and display their talents and use their skills to tide over the crisis
and restore normalcy.
9. DON’T USE
THE CRISIS FOR INCREASING THE POPULARITY
Occasions of
crises attract a wide publicity, both within the organization and outside
including the social media. They are either keen to know what has happened or
what kind of a story could be built which will be beneficial to them. Sometimes
crisis managers do feel happy to engage in such publicity domains and feel a
social recognition either on a positive or a negative note. These actions might
build the profile of the people, but are not certainly professionally relevant.
The focus has to be totally on engaging with the situation rather than using
them for self-promotion. Display of unadulterated professionalism will help in
tiding over the situation with ease.
10. DON’T
HESITATE TO LEARN YOUR LESSONS
Every crisis
brings along with it a set of new lessons – lessons those which relate to
inadequate planning, inadequate supervision, inadequate communication, a sense
of apathy, lack of control points, misplaced trust systems, delayed responses
and the like. It is important for the individual and the team to keenly examine
the cause and the process of crisis; they would open to many lessons which they
had never learnt in their career or in their past learning profile. Crisis
Managers need to analyse, record, discuss and draw inferences from the
indicators that led to the crisis which should help them to put in place a
re-engineered process which would minimise such eventualities.
No comments:
Post a Comment